My imaginary, regular reader cannot have failed to notice that of late my blog cupboard has been bare. It is not a matter of "writers' block", because people who write drivel suffer no such condition. It has been more a case of "War and Peace" syndrome, where what had been intended to be a short, incisive critique of something silly someone had done or said somewhere, turned into a ten thousand word thesis. Frantic editing is now taking place, so something entirely worthless is bound to emerge sooner or later....very much later if that imaginary reader's luck holds.
|
|
||||
|
Saturday, May 27
Wednesday, May 10
by
ContraTory
on Wed 10 May 2006 08:01 BST
The report by Greg Hurst, Dominic Kennedy and Andrew Pierce in The Times this morning that,
is not all bad news for the members of the Liberal Democrats. Presumably if the liability to repay Michael Brown’s £2.4 million donation does materialise, only people who are still members at that particular time, will be liable to make their obligatory contribution?[1] It will be interesting to see how many party members are fair-weather supporters.
[1] Though I am no expert in such matters and I might be entirely wrong. Sunday, May 7
by
ContraTory
on Sun 07 May 2006 20:39 BST
The theory that the transition to a Gordon Brown led administration will lead to a fresh start for the New Labour Government is palpably false. Parallels are being drawn with John Major's succession to the premiership in 1990 when the Conservatives, purportedly effecting a "regime change" by disposing of Mrs Thatcher, avoided defeat by Labour at the General Election in 1992.
Gordon Brown entered Parliament in 1983 becoming Labour's Shadow Chancellor in 1992. He was one of Tony Blair's original "conspirators", playing an integral part in the creation of New Labour. He has been the Chancellor of the Exchequer since 1997 and thus has held one of the two most powerful posts in HM Government for nine long years. As a senior member of the Cabinet he is jointly responsible for every major policy decision involving every part of Government (after all, he is the paymaster.) Thus, along with Mr Blair and the other members of the Cabinet, he is implicated in every failing of the Government. He cannot escape the stench of sleaze or fug of Government incompetence even though he might not be responsible personally. Distancing himself from Mr Blair (and of course the rest of the Cabinet) just does not wash. The implicit "not me guv" stance is not only deceitful and disloyal; arguably it is cowardly.
By contrast, John Major was a nonentity in Mrs Thatcher's first administration. He had not played any part in formulating the principles of the Thatcherite Revolution. He entered Parliament in 1979 and did not enter the Cabinet of the Conservative Government until 5th June 1987[1]. In consequence he was not so sullied by Mrs Thatcher's or her creed’s, perceived failings. The public were entitled to give Mr Major the benefit of the doubt, but not so Mr Brown.
It is forgotten also that New Labour achieved their electoral success by stealing the Conservatives' clothes (so as not to scare the horses) and presenting themselves as more honest, down-to-earth and united than the "sleazy", “division ridden”[2] Conservative Government. Gordon Brown is an unreconstructed socialist. It is by his deeds, not his words, that we know him. He craves Big Government. He is driven to tax hard and spend big. Middle
In truth, Mr Brown is an accomplice without whom the Blair Project could never have come to be. When Mr Blair's collar comes to be felt, whether that be by his erstwhile Parliamentary Labour Party colleagues or the electorate, it is only right and just that Mr Brown stands alongside him, in the dock. Whilst his “Brownite” colleagues will fall over themselves to provide an alibi for their new leader we, the electorate, will not fall for it. You will have to pack your toothbrush, Gordon Brown, because when the time comes, you are going down.
[1] As Chief Secretary to the Treasury. Mr Major had been appointed as Assistant Whip in January 1983 and continued in that capacity until the summer of 1985 when he became the Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Social Security under Norman Fowler. He was appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer in October 1989. [2] The divisions in the Conservative Party concerned the European Community or European Union as it is now known. It is becoming an accepted “faction” that the electorate “booted out” the Conservatives because they had mismanaged the economy as well, but by 1997 the economy had enjoyed seven years of growth without wage- or price- inflation difficulties. |
Categories
This Month
Recent Articles
Month Archive
Search
The Fourth Estate
Political
Law
Government
The Old and not so old, Bill
Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics
Equine
My Mates
Blogs of a Conservative Persuasion
Blogs of a Liberal Democrat Persuasion
Blogs of a Liberal Democrat Persuasion (Not)
Labour's Best
Odds and Sods
Strange People who think of England
Witanagemot Club
Shocking, Politically Incorrect Sites
Serious Trouble Makers
Putting the record straight
More Tory Bloggers
Local Bloggers
Light Entertainment
Campaigns
Recent Visitors
ContraTory - Fri 05 Sep 2008 11:01 BST
Frank - Tue 02 Sep 2008 15:24 BST
Man in a Shed - Tue 17 Jun 2008 19:23 BST
Lynnzer - Fri 25 Apr 2008 15:11 BST
Tom Paine - Sat 28 Apr 2007 15:10 BST
Recent Comments
Recent Trackbacks
Login
|
|||